Won't Work

1 min
read
September 17, 2019
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

Earlier this year I speculated whether the Uber floatation would be the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back for the overburdened Private Equity/VC exit strategy. That turned out not to be the case, albeit the stock is down 25% or so in a matter of months. Which brings us to WeWork, where the biggest investor in Uber, SoftBank, has a stake of around $10bn, including, and this is the important bit for me, a $2bn stake bought at the latest private funding round earlier this year as a (frankly ridiculous) valuation of $47bn. Leaving aside the rightly derided metrics such as “Community adjusted EBITDA’, which is basically income before almost any of their expenses, the real problem is less in the fact that this is basically just an office services company – albeit one seeking to elevate the world’s consciousness (or something) and more the fact that it threatens to let daylight in upon the magic of the Silicon Valley money machine magic.

Anyone who has seen the comedy show Silicon Valley, which at times seems like a documentary, albeit one of a world gone slightly mad, knows that the key is to keep the ‘valuation’ rising for each round, so the fact that (rightly) sceptical investors are talking about a valuation closer to $15-20bn would go a long way to breaking the spell. Softbank which is looking to raise another version of its Vision Fund, is said to be keen for the WeWork IPO to be postponed. It’ easy to see why.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

Gold and Goldilocks

Bond markets are changing their views on Fed policy based on the high frequency data, seemingly unaware that the major variable the Fed is watching is the bond markets themselves. After the funding panic of last September and the regional bank wobble last March, the twin architects of US monetary policy (the Fed is now joined by the Treasury) are focussing on Bond Market stability as their primary aim. Politicians meanwhile, having seen how the bond markets ended the administration of UK Premier Liz Truss in September 2022 are keenly aware that it is not just "the Economy stupid", but the Economy and the markets that they need to manage the narrative for both voters and markets. They all need a form of Goldilocks - either good or bad, but not so good or so bad as to trigger either the markets to sell off or the authorities to react. Investors, meanwhile, conscious of the precarious balancing act Goldilocks requires, are increasingly looking at Gold.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT