Why Good News on Trade Could Be Bad News for Us Investment Grade Bonds (and Taiwan)

1 min
read
November 20, 2019
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

The search for yield is not a new phenomenon, even if it has intensified under QE. For years, the big Japanese Life companies in particular were prone to allocating to strategies that offered high nominal yields in foreign currencies, before running them increasingly unhedged and then getting hit hard by a currency crisis, a crisis they then intensified by rapidly withdrawing their funds. Indeed we could go as far as to suggest that a major contributory factor in several emerging market boom bust cycles was precisely this sort of behaviour. As such we should always be alert for evidence of unhedged carry trades as a source of risk, and it looks like we have one appearing funded by Taiwanese Life Companies. This time however, it is not in emerging market debt, but in US Investment Grade Bonds. With the prospect of a Trade agreement and an appreciation of the Tawianese $, it could unwind very quickly in ‘a flight from quality.’ It merits watching closely.

Currently Taiwanese investors are aggressively chasing locally issued ETFs investing in US investment grade debt, creating a classic bubble warning signal as well as providing a strong bid for US corporate debt markets. This local market has grown by almost 70% this year in terms of size, according to Bloomberg and is forecast to hit $100bn. However, our concern should not be simply the speed of growth – although this is always a warning signal of potential capital misallocation- or that this is largely unhedged carry trading, but rather that this is a clear case of regulatory arbitrage and could, indeed should, attract regulatory attention and thus disappear as quickly as it came, even if the currency doesn’t trigger an unwind first.

The popularity of this new trade follows a recent regulatory crackdown on so called Formosa Bonds – Bonds issued in $US by multi national corporations and sold onshore in Taiwan. These used to be very popular in Taiwan as they were exempt from any cap on foreign assets, and the market grew dramatically over the last five years to over $125bn. Of course the problem here was that the old story that the high(er) yields the bonds were offering were completely eliminated if the clients hedged the currency risk – and so largely they didn’t, similar to the Japanese Life companies of old, ignoring the fact that there really is no such thing as a free lunch. When the Taiwanese currency strengthened against the US$ during 2016 and 2017, the unhedged bond positions registered double digit losses and accordingly last year, local regulators, worried by currency losses, imposed a cap, effectively killing (the growth in) the market.

As is often the way, around the same time, the Taiwan$ peaked against the US$ and began to weaken, largely driven by the Trade War fears that have dominated over the last 18 months. In order to play this currency trade again, and in response to the regulatory crackdown on Formosa Bonds, the Taiwanese insurers have instead issued Formosa ETFs, essentially working around the restriction to create local ETFs that invest in US investment grade bonds. This is of course regulatory arbitrage rather than a new investment strategy. The bond is ‘investment grade’ for capital requirement and is also deemed ‘local currency’, but the return is essentially the same ‘bet’ and is effectively an unhedged foreign currency carry trade. It does of course have the further twist of large counterparty and liquidity risk with the underlying issuer.

As such, I believe we should be watching the Taiwanese $ exchange rate extremely carefully. Between March 2018 and August this year, the Taiwan currency weakened by almost 9% against the US$, largely driven by Trade War concerns, but of course adding a nice enhanced return in local currency terms for the Taiwanese insurers long US Investment Grade Bonds. In fact in the 18 months from March 2018 to September this year, the Trade War play of being long unhedged US Investment Grade Bonds would have returned around 16% in local currency, hence its popularity. Indeed, it can be significantly more than this; to pick just one fund, the Cathay Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate A- and above 10+ years liquid ETF has TWD55bn of assets and is up 24% in local terms over the last year.

Since the peak in August, however, the Taiwan $ has now rallied by around 3.5% and completed a near exact 50% Fibonacci reversal of its Trade War sell off. The risk therefore is that a further rally in the TWD associated with trade war tensions easing and/or a new regulatory crackdown on Formosa ETFs could rapidly reverse the flows into US Investment Grade bond markets. Watch out for that butterfly effect as they say.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking May 2024

After a powerful run from q4 2023, equities paused in April, with many of the momentum stocks simply running out of, well, momentum and leading many to revisit the old adage of 'Sell in May'. Meanwhile, sentiment in the bond markets soured further as the prospect of rate cuts receded - although we remain of the view that the main purpose of rate cuts now is to ensure the stability of bond markets themselves. The best performance once again came from China and Hong Kong as these markets start a (long delayed) catch up as distressed sellers are cleared from the markets. Markets are generally trying to establish some trading ranges for the summer months and while foreign policy is increasingly bellicose as led by politicians facing re-election as well as the defence and energy sector lobbyists, western trade lobbyists are also hard at work, erecting tariff barriers and trying to co-opt third parties to do the same. While this is not good for their own consumers, it is also fighting the reality of high quality, much cheaper, products coming from Asian competitors, most of whom are not also facing high energy costs. Nor is a strong dollar helping. As such, many of the big global companies are facing serious competition in third party markets and investors, also looking to diversify portfolios, are starting to look at their overseas competitors.

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT