Suicide Drones

1 min
read
September 16, 2019
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

The attack on Saudi oil facilities by ‘suicide drones’ at the weekend is having the predictable effect on oil prices and President Trump has authorised some release from the Strategic Oil Reserves, an important but not unprecedented move. (See here for a fascinating article about suicide drones from earlier this year, as well as a lot of background about this largely unreported conflict https://abaadstudies.org/news-59795.html ). The attack does of course also raise further questions about the float of Saudi Aramco. The recent replacement of the Saudi Oil Minister Kalid al-Falih with Abdulaziz bin Salman, half brother of Crown Prince MBS was seen as an acceleration of the process of selling off a stake in Aramco, but that now looks unlikely until and unless the Yemen situation is solved. Having said that, if Oil prices remain elevated then the need to sell Aramco goes away. Meanwhile, the pressure is eased on all the highly leveraged fracking operations in the US, as well as benefitting Russia and Iran.

There have in fact already been signs that the Saudi’s were looking to negotiate a peace, not least because they appear to have fallen out with their Gulf Allies in the region and the realisation that all the expensive foreign military hardware failed to protect their vital strategic asset must be causing serious consternation in Saudi circles. This new asymmetric warfare, where traditional multi billion dollar weapons systems can be challenged by a computer hack or drones costing only a few thousand pounds is of course also a concern to the Military Industrial Complex

Continue Reading

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

Gold and Goldilocks

Bond markets are changing their views on Fed policy based on the high frequency data, seemingly unaware that the major variable the Fed is watching is the bond markets themselves. After the funding panic of last September and the regional bank wobble last March, the twin architects of US monetary policy (the Fed is now joined by the Treasury) are focussing on Bond Market stability as their primary aim. Politicians meanwhile, having seen how the bond markets ended the administration of UK Premier Liz Truss in September 2022 are keenly aware that it is not just "the Economy stupid", but the Economy and the markets that they need to manage the narrative for both voters and markets. They all need a form of Goldilocks - either good or bad, but not so good or so bad as to trigger either the markets to sell off or the authorities to react. Investors, meanwhile, conscious of the precarious balancing act Goldilocks requires, are increasingly looking at Gold.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT