(Really) Won’t Work

1 min
read
September 26, 2019
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

A few days away meant a bit slow in the update on Won’t Work, but news that Adam Neuman has stepped down as CEO yesterday and that he had extracted over $700m in share sales and loans before the (now postponed) IPO just adds to this slow motion car crash of a story. In the meantime, I notice that Goldman Sachs are trying to offload some of their financial obligations to Softbank Vision Fund which of course is the main (only?) backer of We Work, by trying to sell on some of the $3.1bn liquidity financing deal they have. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/garage/goldman-cutting-its-loan-exposure-to-softbank-vision-fund-sources

We Work itself has a lot of finance lines in place, but they are conditional on a successful IPO such that they are likely to be forced to return to the Softbank Vision Fund for more money. Given that the Vision Fund’s biggest backer is the Saudi Investment Fund and they are hardly having a good few weeks either at the moment, we could be looking at a very nasty liquidity crunch.

Perhaps not surprisingly Softbank’s CDS spreads have widened sharply and it’s share price has broken down. When the only buyer in town runs out of liquidity, the things they are buying need to reprice to the next realistic buyer. If they switch from buyer to seller, that gap can be very uncomfortable.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

Gold and Goldilocks

Bond markets are changing their views on Fed policy based on the high frequency data, seemingly unaware that the major variable the Fed is watching is the bond markets themselves. After the funding panic of last September and the regional bank wobble last March, the twin architects of US monetary policy (the Fed is now joined by the Treasury) are focussing on Bond Market stability as their primary aim. Politicians meanwhile, having seen how the bond markets ended the administration of UK Premier Liz Truss in September 2022 are keenly aware that it is not just "the Economy stupid", but the Economy and the markets that they need to manage the narrative for both voters and markets. They all need a form of Goldilocks - either good or bad, but not so good or so bad as to trigger either the markets to sell off or the authorities to react. Investors, meanwhile, conscious of the precarious balancing act Goldilocks requires, are increasingly looking at Gold.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT