In Reply to FT

1 min
read
May 20, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

The FT is required reading, not on the basis it has great wisdom, rather that it embodies the opinion of “The Powers That Be (TPTB). Thus when it runs a story like the following, from Stephen Moore, apparently an advisor to Donald Trump, that not only advises pumping up the stock market as a ‘cure’ to the current collapse in demand, but displays an alarming lack of understanding of how markets work, let alone economies, we should take notice. And on this occasion comment and well.

Deflation is the real killer of prosperity
https://www.ft.com/content/c0cff3e0-913b-11ea-bc44-dbf6756c871a#comments-anchor
Stephen Moore Financial Times

And on this occasion, to comment as well.

https://www.ft.com/content/c0cff3e0-913b-11ea-bc44-dbf6756c871a?commentID=5e4c30eb-929e-4b16-a728-1c03579e19a6

For those without access beyond FT paywall.

It is alarming if the writer’s view of economies is influencing the President of the United States. Deliberately collapsing demand against a given level of supply will obviously cause a drop in prices so that markets clear, but that is not deflation. Equally, the idea that commodity prices are the ‘best day to day indicator of inflation’ has no basis in reality, where leveraged positions in commodity futures drive almost all day to day movements and where commodity prices themselves are a fraction of the input costs in a service based economy. Similarly the idea that in a world of QE and forced buying of government bonds for ‘risk’ reasons the bond yield, or even TIPS, has any predictive power of the CPI is up there with ‘assume perfect competition’ as a realistic way of predicting the economy.
Modern inflation has been a function of too much money chasing too few goods and that has tended to be in asset prices or where supply has been restricted in its ability to meet demand. Draining the leverage in the financial system may well lead to lower/correct pricing of financial assets, as will allowing more competition in the provisions of certain goods and services. I am sure that dis-inflation in drug prices would please everyone in the US except the drug companies and their lobbyists for example.
The idea that we should, once again fluff up asset prices in response to the collective act of self harm that is lockdown is akin to 16th century doctors applying leaches to cure everything, both obsessive and misguided. We need to remove the lockdown, allow the gig economy to recover and for prices in the real world (not the financial markets which remain utterly distorted by Fed policy) to balance demand and supply. Dis-inflation, driven by productivity and technology lowering unit costs of production is a driver of prosperity not a threat to it and should be embraced, not feared.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

Gold and Goldilocks

Bond markets are changing their views on Fed policy based on the high frequency data, seemingly unaware that the major variable the Fed is watching is the bond markets themselves. After the funding panic of last September and the regional bank wobble last March, the twin architects of US monetary policy (the Fed is now joined by the Treasury) are focussing on Bond Market stability as their primary aim. Politicians meanwhile, having seen how the bond markets ended the administration of UK Premier Liz Truss in September 2022 are keenly aware that it is not just "the Economy stupid", but the Economy and the markets that they need to manage the narrative for both voters and markets. They all need a form of Goldilocks - either good or bad, but not so good or so bad as to trigger either the markets to sell off or the authorities to react. Investors, meanwhile, conscious of the precarious balancing act Goldilocks requires, are increasingly looking at Gold.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT