High and Dry

1 min
read
February 14, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

On the 4th September last year, the Baltic Dry Index that measures the cost of shipping – and by extension is a good proxy for the demand supply imbalance in global trade – stood at 2518. As of Friday, it stood at 415, not quite as low as it hit briefly in early 2016 in the midst of a glut of shipping and a commodity bear market, but below the crash level after the financial crisis in 2008/9. The Baltic Dirty Index, which is essentially tanker rates has also dropped sharply, but has ‘only’ halved since the start of the year. Undoutedly this is down to the Crona Virus threat and historically, the Baltic dry has appeared to have a correlation, with something of a lead, with the Chinese Purchasing managers’ index – something we previously acknowledged will be relatively meaningless for a while now but will undoubtedly look very bad on the next print.  As previously noted, the market response following the corona virus scare is to sell cyclical and trading related business based on the economic reality that by halting activity, heavily operationally geared businesses with high fixed costs run into trouble, even if the halt is only temporary.

The Baltic Dry is telling us how bad trade is

As a help to understand when things are actually moving again therefore, the Baltic dry may be a helpful leading economic indicator, not least because it takes out speculation – it is the price of actual ships contracted to move ‘stuff’.  As of today however, the index remains in ‘stay on the sidelines’ territory.

Continue Reading

Model Portfolio Changes

Periodically, we take the opportunity to refresh our portfolio of Themes, incorporating new ideas to replace ones that that we think are no longing offering attractive risk return opportunities. We monitor the new ideas for a period, before incorporating them when we think the risk return is attractive, guided by our confidence scoring systems. As the risk return profile more generally has improved and as we reallocate cash back into our themes, we have added two new themes from our 'watch list' - Japanese Wholesale and Trading Companies and Emerging Markets ex China. The note provides more details and background.

Will the Magnificent Seven Ride Again?

This year has been all about the Magnificent 7 mega cap Tech Stocks, who have contributed 95% of all the S&P Return. But then so was last year, when they subtracted an almost identical amount in terms of Contribution to Return. So what for 2024? Those who bought in January were buying value in heavily discounted growth, an argument that doesn't hold this year. Many who bought in q3 were chasing momentum and/or short covering underweight positions. Neither of which are sustainable strategies. The story we are currently telling ourselves is AI, but that is going to have to translate into heavily superior earnings from here.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT