High and Dry

1 min
read
February 14, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

On the 4th September last year, the Baltic Dry Index that measures the cost of shipping – and by extension is a good proxy for the demand supply imbalance in global trade – stood at 2518. As of Friday, it stood at 415, not quite as low as it hit briefly in early 2016 in the midst of a glut of shipping and a commodity bear market, but below the crash level after the financial crisis in 2008/9. The Baltic Dirty Index, which is essentially tanker rates has also dropped sharply, but has ‘only’ halved since the start of the year. Undoutedly this is down to the Crona Virus threat and historically, the Baltic dry has appeared to have a correlation, with something of a lead, with the Chinese Purchasing managers’ index – something we previously acknowledged will be relatively meaningless for a while now but will undoubtedly look very bad on the next print.  As previously noted, the market response following the corona virus scare is to sell cyclical and trading related business based on the economic reality that by halting activity, heavily operationally geared businesses with high fixed costs run into trouble, even if the halt is only temporary.

The Baltic Dry is telling us how bad trade is

As a help to understand when things are actually moving again therefore, the Baltic dry may be a helpful leading economic indicator, not least because it takes out speculation – it is the price of actual ships contracted to move ‘stuff’.  As of today however, the index remains in ‘stay on the sidelines’ territory.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

Gold and Goldilocks

Bond markets are changing their views on Fed policy based on the high frequency data, seemingly unaware that the major variable the Fed is watching is the bond markets themselves. After the funding panic of last September and the regional bank wobble last March, the twin architects of US monetary policy (the Fed is now joined by the Treasury) are focussing on Bond Market stability as their primary aim. Politicians meanwhile, having seen how the bond markets ended the administration of UK Premier Liz Truss in September 2022 are keenly aware that it is not just "the Economy stupid", but the Economy and the markets that they need to manage the narrative for both voters and markets. They all need a form of Goldilocks - either good or bad, but not so good or so bad as to trigger either the markets to sell off or the authorities to react. Investors, meanwhile, conscious of the precarious balancing act Goldilocks requires, are increasingly looking at Gold.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT