Circular Arguments

1 min
read
February 14, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

FX traders are the ultimate noise traders, using vast leverage and chasing percentage moves that barely touch the real world. Next are the commodity traders, using less, but still meaningful amounts of leverage, then fixed income, again with leverage but less than commodities. Finally come equities, with little or no leverage. There is a mantra beloved of fixed income traders that FI is clever and equities are dumb, because Equities tend not to buy into all the economic excitement the traders try so hard to generate on a constant basis. As noted in the previous post, the obsession with high frequency but poor quality (and often very poorly interpreted) data such as the PMI indices, or the theatre of the non farm payrolls will thankfully be so confused by the virus situation that the usual trading on speculation will be less frantic for a while at least.

Meanwhile, the traders and the economists that feed them also refer to Copper as Dr Copper, the metal with the PhD in economics. It is interesting to see therefore the high correlation between the opinions of the Copper and Gold markets and the Fixed income markets, as revealed in the following chart, a line of Gold versus Copper compared to a line showing TLT, the long bond ETF. Who follows who? Difficult to say over the last five years, but certainly it suggests that the ‘bets’ of macro traders may all be the same direction, indeed the same thing.

Gold over Copper and Long Bonds, who follows who? Or just the same trade?

Continue Reading

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

Gold and Goldilocks

Bond markets are changing their views on Fed policy based on the high frequency data, seemingly unaware that the major variable the Fed is watching is the bond markets themselves. After the funding panic of last September and the regional bank wobble last March, the twin architects of US monetary policy (the Fed is now joined by the Treasury) are focussing on Bond Market stability as their primary aim. Politicians meanwhile, having seen how the bond markets ended the administration of UK Premier Liz Truss in September 2022 are keenly aware that it is not just "the Economy stupid", but the Economy and the markets that they need to manage the narrative for both voters and markets. They all need a form of Goldilocks - either good or bad, but not so good or so bad as to trigger either the markets to sell off or the authorities to react. Investors, meanwhile, conscious of the precarious balancing act Goldilocks requires, are increasingly looking at Gold.

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT