Build Back Better..but for Whom?

1 min
read
October 15, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

Many observers will have spotted the sudden (and repeated) use of the expression “Build back better” in both the UK and the US.

We see these moments as the time to learn and to improve on the world that went before. That is why this government will build back better.
Boris Johnson UK Prime Minister Conference Speech October 2020
BBC

Boris Johnson used the expression in a speech last week at a virtual Conservative Party conference against a backdrop of the slogan. US viewers meanwhile will have spotted the fact that it is also used by the Biden Presidential Campaign.

“Folks, it’s not sufficient to build back, we have to build back better,” Biden said Thursday. “That’s why my plan is to build back better.”
Joe Biden Campaign Speech July 2020
US News

So who came up with it first? After all, Joe Biden has a bit of history of ‘borrowing’ from other politicians, be it Neil Kinnock or Bobby Kennedy. In fact, the answer is that both of them got the slogan from the UN.

The expression Build Back Better has its origins in the disaster recovery plans advanced after the 2015 Japanese earthquake and ratified by the UN. However, its real significance is in the fact that the globalists at the UN launched a Coronavirus recovery fund with the tag line Build Back Better at the end of March 2020, as we can see with this press release https://reliefweb.int/report/world/un-launches-global-fund-fight-coronavirus-and-build-back-better

BuildBackbetter Challenge, reimagining the UN together visual
UN

At the same time the UN issued a report on the need for a Global response and in the attached press release made its (established) agenda very clear

The third step is to learn from this crisis and build back better. Had we been further advanced in meeting the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, we could better face this challenge – with stronger health systems, fewer people living in extreme poverty, less gender inequality, a healthier natural environment, and more resilient societies. We must seize the opportunity of this crisis to strengthen our commitment to implement the 2030 Agenda and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals.
UN Press Release March 2020

There is even a website https://www.buildbackbetteruk.org/ which had a week of action last week (apparently) and is essentially a Green New Deal type organisation, backed by, no surprise perhaps, the UN. Equally and , perhaps not surprisingly, the expression was also widely used in the incredibly detailed (and thus a long time in preparation) Great Reset report from the World Economic Forum – otherwise known as the men of Davos – that came out very quickly as the Covid ‘crisis’ evolved this summer.

A true recovery from COVID-19 will not be about putting things back together the way they were: we need to ‘build back better’, to ‘reset’, if we are to address the deep systemic vulnerabilities the pandemic has exposed.

Peter Bakker
, President and CEO, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (World Economic Forum) July 2020

What we can see therefore is that within an extremely short space of time- the UN, the Men of Davos and all those advocating for Green New Deals had already moved to repackage their existing agendas as a ‘Solution’ to the Covid crisis. Those wielding a sustainability hammer have identified Covid as a nail. It is equally clear that most western politicians are now fully bought into this agenda, previous reservations over the cost versus benefits now swept aside by the tide of ’emergency funding’. Europe is already bought in, the only thing stopping the US joining in is President Trump.

Indeed we would go as far as to say that this will be the primary difference between a Trump and a Biden administration.

This of course now starts to illuminate the likely path for 2021. As the UK leaves the EU it will likely find that there is in fact another supra-national body setting most of the ‘rules’. EU has been replaced with UN and its multiple agencies

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
WON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN. THE WHO (NOT THE W.H.O.)

As we noted months ago, (they have plans for your savings) part of this will involve the UN effectively taking control of the west’s institutional savings pools through the mandating of ESG and UN sustainable goals, meaning that they will be allocating capital based on their agenda. How this fits with Fiduciary responsibility for the underlying investor will be a battle for another day.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking May 2024

After a powerful run from q4 2023, equities paused in April, with many of the momentum stocks simply running out of, well, momentum and leading many to revisit the old adage of 'Sell in May'. Meanwhile, sentiment in the bond markets soured further as the prospect of rate cuts receded - although we remain of the view that the main purpose of rate cuts now is to ensure the stability of bond markets themselves. The best performance once again came from China and Hong Kong as these markets start a (long delayed) catch up as distressed sellers are cleared from the markets. Markets are generally trying to establish some trading ranges for the summer months and while foreign policy is increasingly bellicose as led by politicians facing re-election as well as the defence and energy sector lobbyists, western trade lobbyists are also hard at work, erecting tariff barriers and trying to co-opt third parties to do the same. While this is not good for their own consumers, it is also fighting the reality of high quality, much cheaper, products coming from Asian competitors, most of whom are not also facing high energy costs. Nor is a strong dollar helping. As such, many of the big global companies are facing serious competition in third party markets and investors, also looking to diversify portfolios, are starting to look at their overseas competitors.

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT