High and Dry

1 min
read
February 14, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

On the 4th September last year, the Baltic Dry Index that measures the cost of shipping – and by extension is a good proxy for the demand supply imbalance in global trade – stood at 2518. As of Friday, it stood at 415, not quite as low as it hit briefly in early 2016 in the midst of a glut of shipping and a commodity bear market, but below the crash level after the financial crisis in 2008/9. The Baltic Dirty Index, which is essentially tanker rates has also dropped sharply, but has ‘only’ halved since the start of the year. Undoutedly this is down to the Crona Virus threat and historically, the Baltic dry has appeared to have a correlation, with something of a lead, with the Chinese Purchasing managers’ index – something we previously acknowledged will be relatively meaningless for a while now but will undoubtedly look very bad on the next print.  As previously noted, the market response following the corona virus scare is to sell cyclical and trading related business based on the economic reality that by halting activity, heavily operationally geared businesses with high fixed costs run into trouble, even if the halt is only temporary.

The Baltic Dry is telling us how bad trade is

As a help to understand when things are actually moving again therefore, the Baltic dry may be a helpful leading economic indicator, not least because it takes out speculation – it is the price of actual ships contracted to move ‘stuff’.  As of today however, the index remains in ‘stay on the sidelines’ territory.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking May 2024

After a powerful run from q4 2023, equities paused in April, with many of the momentum stocks simply running out of, well, momentum and leading many to revisit the old adage of 'Sell in May'. Meanwhile, sentiment in the bond markets soured further as the prospect of rate cuts receded - although we remain of the view that the main purpose of rate cuts now is to ensure the stability of bond markets themselves. The best performance once again came from China and Hong Kong as these markets start a (long delayed) catch up as distressed sellers are cleared from the markets. Markets are generally trying to establish some trading ranges for the summer months and while foreign policy is increasingly bellicose as led by politicians facing re-election as well as the defence and energy sector lobbyists, western trade lobbyists are also hard at work, erecting tariff barriers and trying to co-opt third parties to do the same. While this is not good for their own consumers, it is also fighting the reality of high quality, much cheaper, products coming from Asian competitors, most of whom are not also facing high energy costs. Nor is a strong dollar helping. As such, many of the big global companies are facing serious competition in third party markets and investors, also looking to diversify portfolios, are starting to look at their overseas competitors.

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT